Close

Academic Paper: Earthquake recovery versus routine maintenance

A design guideline for post-disaster repairs could ease the rebuild pain for asset owners.

This paper, written by Paul S. Botha and Eric Scheepbouwer, suggests that post-disaster repairs to horizontal infrastructure could be heavily influenced by design guidelines provided by asset owners.

All asset owners should maintain up-to-date asset registers and prepare guidelines in readiness for emergency situations.

Wastewater network damage would vary throughout a region, partly depending on the previous asset level of service. Repairs would logically bring assets back to the pre-disaster level, or remaining asset life. Therefore, asset owners need to know the state of their assets in order to prove the disaster damage.

A register baseline could discern between disaster-related faults and general network wear and tear.

Glossary terms:

  • Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team (SCIRT)
  • Infrastructure Rebuild Management Office (IRMO)
  • Infrastructure Recovery Technical Standards and Guidelines (IRTSG)

Attachments

Earthquake recovery versus routine maintenance of the waste water network in Christchurch Cover
Earthquake recovery versus routine maintenance of the waste water network in Christchurch

A paper published in the Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 2016, Vol. 1, No. 2, 88-93, which outlines the importance of asset registers and level of service in the wake of a disaster.

Size:

987.58 KB